Comments on: Validation considered harmful

By: Integrate This»Blog Archive » David Baron on versioning

Integrate This»Blog Archive » David Baron on versioning — Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:29:11 +0000

[...] David Baron of Mozilla has chimed in on a topic near and dear to much of the work we do at Coactus. It looks like it’s part one of a series; I look forward to the rest. [...]

By: Integrate This»Blog Archive » Two more reasons why validation is still harmful

Tue, 02 Jan 2007 04:55:09 +0000

[...] Another way to look at the validation problem is through the eyes of a software architect. We’re often concerned about “encapsulation”, the practice of keeping related business logic and data together. That practice can take the form of “objects” in OO systems, or just through the partitioning of data and processing logic in non-OO systems. In either form, the value there is that maintainability is improved. [...]

By: subbu.org

subbu.org — Tue, 26 Dec 2006 17:52:55 +0000

Is Validation Harmful?

This post is in response to Mark Baker’s post on Validation Considered Harmful. He is partly right about the harmfulness of validation in the specific use case discussed in his post, but I disagree with the generalization implied in his post. Whether…

By: Marc de Graauw - Random Notes » Blog Archive » Validate for Machines, not Humans

Fri, 22 Dec 2006 10:50:15 +0000

[...] Mark Baker misses an important distinction in “Validation Considered Harmful” when he writes: [...]

By: protocol7 » Blog Archive » links for 2006-12-15

protocol7 » Blog Archive » links for 2006-12-15 — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 12:19:45 +0000

[...] Validation considered harmful (tags: XML validation schema rest by:mark_baker) [...]

By: Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - Versioning Does Not Make Validation Irrelevant

Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - Versioning Does Not Make Validation Irrelevant — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:57:36 +0000

[...] [...]